Ô nhiễm không khí trong Băng Cốc: chỉ số chất lượng không khí thời gian thực và cảnh báo khói.

Địa Điểm: « Băng Cốc Băng Cốc

Ô nhiễm không khí trong Băng Cốc từ tháng 12 năm 2016 đến tháng 5 năm 2020

index 2020-05 2020-04 2020-03 2020-02 2020-01 2019-12 2019-11 2019-10 2019-09 2019-08 2019-07 2019-06 2018-01 2017-12 2017-11 2017-10 2017-07 2017-06 2017-05 2017-04 2017-03 2017-02 2017-01 2016-11 2016-10 2016-09 2016-08 2016-07 2016-06 2016-05 2016-04 2016-03 2016-02 2016-01 2015-12 2015-11 2015-10 2019-05 2019-04 2019-03 2019-02 2019-01 2018-12 2018-11 2018-10 2018-09 2018-08 2018-07 2018-06 2018-05 2018-04 2018-03 2018-02 2017-09 2017-08 2016-12
no2:ppm 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.03 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.05 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.04 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.03 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) - (Good)
pm10 32 (Moderate) 41 (Moderate) 49 (Moderate) 77 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 70 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 63 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 59 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 51 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 53 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 38 (Moderate) 50 (Moderate) 51 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 61 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 50 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 50 (Moderate) 52 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 34 (Moderate) 38 (Moderate) 38 (Moderate) 43 (Moderate) 52 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 64 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 61 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 56 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 29 (Moderate) 26 (Moderate) 61 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 28 (Moderate) 25 (Moderate) 28 (Moderate) 44 (Moderate) 58 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 69 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 50 (Moderate) 64 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 46 (Moderate) 53 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 60 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 38 (Moderate) 49 (Moderate) 51 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 88 (Unhealthy) 75 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 72 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 53 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 48 (Moderate) 44 (Moderate) 50 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 39 (Moderate) 39 (Moderate) 47 (Moderate) 54 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 72 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) 47 (Moderate) 40 (Moderate) 248 (Very bad Hazardous)
co:ppm 0.94 (Good) 0.68 (Good) 0.65 (Good) 0.8 (Good) 1 (Good) 1 (Good) 0.76 (Good) 0.86 (Good) 0.82 (Good) 0.5 (Good) 0.63 (Good) 0.92 (Good) 1.5 (Good) 1.2 (Good) 1.4 (Good) 1.6 (Good) 1.2 (Good) 1.1 (Good) 0.86 (Good) 0.6 (Good) 1.3 (Good) 1.1 (Good) 1 (Good) 1.1 (Good) 0.44 (Good) 0.54 (Good) 0.71 (Good) 0.44 (Good) 0.63 (Good) 0.7 (Good) 0.86 (Good) 0.73 (Good) 1 (Good) 0.81 (Good) 1 (Good) 1.2 (Good) 1.3 (Good) 0.97 (Good) 0.68 (Good) 0.74 (Good) 0.58 (Good) 1.2 (Good) 1.4 (Good) 1.3 (Good) 1.7 (Good) 1.6 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) 1.6 (Good) 1.1 (Good) 1.2 (Good) 1.3 (Good) 0.98 (Good) 0.86 (Good)
o3:ppm - (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.02 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0.01 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good)
so2:ppm - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0.01 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) 0 (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good) - (Good)
data source »

Chất lượng cuộc sống trong Băng Cốc

Màu xanh lá cây và công viên trong thành phố

Băng Cốc 43%

laoPDR: 37% Campuchia: 36% Việt Nam: 42% Myanmar: 33% Malaysia: 54%

vật chất hạt PM 2.5

Băng Cốc 28 (Moderate)

Niềm vui của chi tiêu thời gian trong thành phố

Băng Cốc 37%

laoPDR: 38% Campuchia: 32% Việt Nam: 30% Myanmar: 24% Malaysia: 48%

vật chất dạng hạt PM10

Băng Cốc 41 (Moderate)

Ô nhiễm không khí

Băng Cốc 74%

laoPDR: 72% Campuchia: 68% Việt Nam: 78% Myanmar: 83% Malaysia: 53%

Nghiền rác

Băng Cốc 40%

laoPDR: 20% Campuchia: 25% Việt Nam: 24% Myanmar: 12% Malaysia: 47%

Sẵn có và chất lượng nước uống

Băng Cốc 50%

laoPDR: 51% Campuchia: 48% Việt Nam: 43% Myanmar: 34% Malaysia: 56%

Sạch sẽ và ngon

Băng Cốc 35%

laoPDR: 32% Campuchia: 25% Việt Nam: 29% Myanmar: 18% Malaysia: 47%

Tiếng ồn và ô nhiễm ánh sáng

Băng Cốc 59%

laoPDR: 55% Campuchia: 59% Việt Nam: 65% Myanmar: 52% Malaysia: 49%

Ô nhiễm nước

Băng Cốc 70%

laoPDR: 73% Campuchia: 73% Việt Nam: 73% Myanmar: 74% Malaysia: 62%
Source: Numbeo


Chong Nonsi, Yannawa

index 2020-05 2020-04 2020-03 2020-02 2020-01 2019-12 2019-11 2019-10 2019-09 2019-08 2019-07 2019-06 2018-01 2017-12 2017-11 2017-10 2017-07 2017-06 2017-05 2017-04 2017-03 2017-02 2017-01 2016-11 2016-10 2016-09 2016-08 2016-07 2016-06 2016-05 2016-04 2016-03 2016-02 2016-01 2015-12 2015-11 2015-10
no2:ppm 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 - 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 - - 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04
o3:ppm - 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 - - - - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 - - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
co:ppm - 0.45 0.34 0.52 0.59 0.52 0.54 0.49 0.48 0.29 0.3 - 1.8 - 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.3 0.86 0.6 1.3 1.1 1 1.1 0.44 0.54 0.42 0.44 0.63 0.7 0.86 0.73 1 0.81 1 1.2 1.3
so2:ppm - - - - - - 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
pm10 31 38 50 76 71 62 58 52 56 42 55 60 53 35 38 52 26 32 38 43 52 64 61 56 29 26 32 28 25 28 44 58 69 50 64 46 53

Rama IV Rd., Pathum Wan

index 2020-05 2020-04 2020-03 2020-02 2020-01 2019-12 2019-11 2019-10 2019-09 2019-08 2019-07 2019-06 2019-05 2019-04 2019-03 2019-02 2019-01 2018-12 2018-11 2018-10 2018-09 2018-08 2018-07 2018-06 2018-05 2018-04 2018-03 2018-02 2018-01 2017-12 2017-11 2017-10 2017-09 2017-08 2017-07 2017-06 2016-12 2016-08
pm10 34 43 49 78 69 65 60 50 50 34 44 42 60 38 49 51 88 75 72 53 48 44 50 39 39 47 54 72 68 65 61 52 47 40 43 44 248 91
co:ppm 0.94 0.9 0.97 1.1 1.4 1.5 0.97 1.2 1.2 0.72 0.96 0.92 0.97 0.68 0.74 0.58 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.6 - - - - 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.98 0.95 0.91 0.86 1
no2:ppm 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 - -

* Pollution data source: https://openaq.org (Thailand) The data is licensed under CC-By 4.0