| index | 2017-10 | 2017-09 | 2017-08 | 2017-07 | 2017-06 | 2017-05 | 2017-04 | 2017-03 | 2017-02 | 2017-01 | 2016-12 | 2016-11 | 2016-10 | 2016-09 | 2016-07 | 2016-06 | 2016-05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| so2 | 1.8 (Good) | 5 (Good) | 3.8 (Good) | 6.8 (Good) | 4.8 (Good) | 4.3 (Good) | 3.5 (Good) | 4.1 (Good) | 6.1 (Good) | 3.9 (Good) | 4.6 (Good) | 3.4 (Good) | 3.3 (Good) | 3.6 (Good) | 5 (Good) | 3.6 (Good) | 2.7 (Good) |
| no2 | 38 (Good) | 45 (Moderate) | 42 (Moderate) | 33 (Good) | 68 (Moderate) | 37 (Good) | 28 (Good) | 29 (Good) | 35 (Good) | 34 (Good) | 35 (Good) | 32 (Good) | 31 (Good) | 35 (Good) | 50 (Moderate) | 40 (Good) | 31 (Good) |
| pm10 | 30 (Moderate) | 53 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) | 36 (Moderate) | 38 (Moderate) | 34 (Moderate) | 27 (Moderate) | 22 (Moderate) | 22 (Moderate) | 27 (Moderate) | 21 (Moderate) | 27 (Moderate) | 26 (Moderate) | 22 (Moderate) | 31 (Moderate) | 57 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups) | 39 (Moderate) | 28 (Moderate) |
| co:ppm | 0.45 (Good) | 0.55 (Good) | 0.58 (Good) | 0.46 (Good) | 0.54 (Good) | 0.33 (Good) | 0.23 (Good) | 0.24 (Good) | 0.27 (Good) | 0.28 (Good) | 0.25 (Good) | 0.24 (Good) | 0.3 (Good) | 0.35 (Good) | 0.82 (Good) | 0.99 (Good) | 0.69 (Good) |
| o3 | 54 (Good) | 60 (Good) | 34 (Good) | 31 (Good) | 19 (Good) | 25 (Good) | 32 (Good) | 35 (Good) | 42 (Good) | 40 (Good) | 49 (Good) | 43 (Good) | 45 (Good) | 42 (Good) | 27 (Good) | 21 (Good) | 22 (Good) |
Green y Parks in the City
São Caetano do Sul 63 %
Paraguay: 46 % Bolivia: 55 % Montenegro: 53 % Surinam: 40 % Uruguay: 65 %partículas de materia PM2.5
São Caetano do Sul 17 (Moderate)
El placer de pasar tiempo en la ciudad
São Caetano do Sul 50 %
Paraguay: 49 % Bolivia: 40 % Montenegro: 69 % Surinam: 63 % Uruguay: 67 %partículas de materia PM10
São Caetano do Sul 37 (Moderate)
Contaminación del aire
São Caetano do Sul 54 %
Paraguay: 56 % Bolivia: 64 % Montenegro: 40 % Surinam: 39 % Uruguay: 29 %Eliminación de basura
São Caetano do Sul 75 %
Paraguay: 30 % Bolivia: 34 % Montenegro: 42 % Uruguay: 34 %Disponibilidad y calidad del agua potable
São Caetano do Sul 88 %
Paraguay: 57 % Montenegro: 71 % Surinam: 64 % Uruguay: 73 %Limpieza y orden
São Caetano do Sul 75 %
Paraguay: 26 % Bolivia: 32 % Montenegro: 51 % Surinam: 36 % Uruguay: 38 %Contaminación acústica y lumínica
São Caetano do Sul 25 %
Paraguay: 52 % Bolivia: 59 % Montenegro: 32 % Surinam: 34 % Uruguay: 48 %Contaminación del agua
São Caetano do Sul 13 %
Paraguay: 65 % Bolivia: 66 % Montenegro: 38 % Surinam: 57 % Uruguay: 46 %São Caetano do Sul
| index | 2017-10 | 2017-09 | 2017-08 | 2017-07 | 2017-06 | 2017-05 | 2017-04 | 2017-03 | 2017-02 | 2017-01 | 2016-12 | 2016-11 | 2016-10 | 2016-09 | 2016-07 | 2016-06 | 2016-05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| so2 | 1.8 | 5 | 3.8 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 6.1 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 5 | 3.6 | 2.7 |
| no2 | 38 | 45 | 42 | 33 | 68 | 37 | 28 | 29 | 35 | 34 | 35 | 32 | 31 | 35 | 50 | 40 | 31 |
| pm10 | 30 | 53 | 36 | 38 | 34 | 27 | 22 | 22 | 27 | 21 | 27 | 26 | 22 | 31 | 57 | 39 | 28 |
| co:ppm | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| o3 | 54 | 60 | 34 | 31 | 19 | 25 | 32 | 35 | 42 | 40 | 49 | 43 | 45 | 42 | 27 | 21 | 22 |