Luftforurening i Chiang Rai: Real-time Air Quality Index og smog alarm.

Placeringer: Chiang Rai »

Luftforurening i Chiang Rai fra oktober 2015 til maj 2020

index	2020-05	2020-04	2020-03	2020-02	2020-01	2019-12	2019-11	2019-10	2019-09	2019-08	2019-07	2019-06	2019-05	2019-04	2019-03	2019-02	2019-01	2018-12	2018-11	2018-10	2018-09	2018-08	2018-07	2018-06	2018-05	2018-04	2018-03	2018-02	2018-01	2017-12	2017-11	2017-10	2017-09	2017-08	2017-07	2017-06	2017-05	2017-04	2017-03	2017-02	2017-01	2016-12	2016-11	2016-10	2016-09	2016-08	2016-07	2016-06	2016-05	2016-04	2016-03	2016-02	2016-01	2015-12	2015-11	2015-10
co:ppm	0.49 (Good)	1 (Good)	1.6 (Good)	0.84 (Good)	0.7 (Good)	0.7 (Good)	0.64 (Good)	0.59 (Good)	0.69 (Good)	0.63 (Good)	0.31 (Good)	0.48 (Good)	1.1 (Good)	1.4 (Good)	1.5 (Good)	0.68 (Good)	0.63 (Good)	1.1 (Good)	0.63 (Good)	1 (Good)	0.76 (Good)	0.67 (Good)	0.47 (Good)	0.69 (Good)	0.55 (Good)	0.7 (Good)	0.75 (Good)	1.1 (Good)	0.7 (Good)	0.95 (Good)	1.4 (Good)	1.4 (Good)	1.3 (Good)	0.8 (Good)	0.7 (Good)	0.64 (Good)	0.82 (Good)	0.54 (Good)	1.2 (Good)	0.78 (Good)	0.88 (Good)	0.67 (Good)	0.43 (Good)	0.38 (Good)	0.17 (Good)	2.6 (Good)	0.85 (Good)	1.1 (Good)	0.81 (Good)	1.7 (Good)	0.66 (Good)	0.62 (Good)	0.47 (Good)	0.47 (Good)	2.3 (Good)	0.43 (Good)
o3:ppm	0.03 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.05 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.04 (Good)	0.03 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)
pm10	31 (Moderate)	93 (Unhealthy)	181 (Very bad Hazardous)	77 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	46 (Moderate)	44 (Moderate)	32 (Moderate)	26 (Moderate)	25 (Moderate)	24 (Moderate)	21 (Moderate)	23 (Moderate)	73 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	125 (Very Unhealthy)	153 (Very bad Hazardous)	66 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	34 (Moderate)	37 (Moderate)	30 (Moderate)	26 (Moderate)	19 (Good)	27 (Moderate)	17 (Good)	22 (Moderate)	30 (Moderate)	61 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	76 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	53 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	31 (Moderate)	32 (Moderate)	26 (Moderate)	19 (Good)	22 (Moderate)	27 (Moderate)	19 (Good)	27 (Moderate)	42 (Moderate)	54 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	78 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	53 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	32 (Moderate)	38 (Moderate)	27 (Moderate)	23 (Moderate)	21 (Moderate)	19 (Good)	17 (Good)	20 (Moderate)	48 (Moderate)	144 (Very Unhealthy)	132 (Very Unhealthy)	57 (Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups)	38 (Moderate)	36 (Moderate)	27 (Moderate)	33 (Moderate)
no2:ppm	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	- (Good)	0.01 (Good)	- (Good)
so2:ppm	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.01 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0.02 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	0 (Good)	- (Good)	- (Good)	0 (Good)

data source »

Livskvalitet i Chiang Rai

Grønne og parker i byen

Chiang Rai 61 %

laoPDR: 37 % Cambodja: 36 % Vietnam: 42 % Myanmar: 33 % Malaysia: 54 %

partikler PM2,5

Chiang Rai 27 (Moderate)

Fornøjelse at tilbringe tid i byen

Chiang Rai 32 %

laoPDR: 38 % Cambodja: 32 % Vietnam: 30 % Myanmar: 24 % Malaysia: 48 %

partikler PM10

Chiang Rai 49 (Moderate)

Luftforurening

Chiang Rai 79 %

laoPDR: 72 % Cambodja: 68 % Vietnam: 78 % Myanmar: 83 % Malaysia: 53 %

Bortskaffelse af affald

Chiang Rai 50 %

laoPDR: 20 % Cambodja: 25 % Vietnam: 24 % Myanmar: 12 % Malaysia: 47 %

Drikkevandets tilgængelighed og kvalitet

Chiang Rai 52 %

laoPDR: 51 % Cambodja: 48 % Vietnam: 43 % Myanmar: 34 % Malaysia: 56 %

Renlighed og ryddelighed

Chiang Rai 59 %

laoPDR: 32 % Cambodja: 25 % Vietnam: 29 % Myanmar: 18 % Malaysia: 47 %

Støj- og lysforurening

Chiang Rai 46 %

laoPDR: 55 % Cambodja: 59 % Vietnam: 65 % Myanmar: 52 % Malaysia: 49 %

Vandforurening

Chiang Rai 62 %

laoPDR: 73 % Cambodja: 73 % Vietnam: 73 % Myanmar: 74 % Malaysia: 62 %

Source: Numbeo

Wiang Phang Kham, Mae Sai

index	2020-05	2020-04	2020-03	2020-02	2020-01	2019-12	2019-11	2019-10	2019-09	2019-08	2019-07	2019-06	2019-05	2019-04	2019-03	2019-02	2019-01	2018-12	2018-11	2018-10	2018-09	2018-08	2018-07	2018-06	2018-05	2018-04	2018-03	2018-02	2018-01	2017-12	2017-11	2017-10	2017-09	2017-08	2017-07	2017-06	2017-05	2017-04	2017-03	2017-02	2017-01	2016-12	2016-11	2016-10	2016-09	2016-08	2016-07	2016-06	2016-05	2016-04	2016-03	2016-02	2016-01	2015-12	2015-11	2015-10
pm10	32	104	228	82	53	51	38	29	27	19	19	22	75	143	187	59	30	31	28	23	19	20	20	26	32	61	75	50	30	29	26	19	25	38	23	38	47	59	85	54	33	37	30	24	23	21	22	26	50	178	151	52	38	40	28	35
co:ppm	0.55	1.2	2.2	0.98	0.76	0.74	0.68	0.65	0.9	0.93	0.38	0.5	1.3	1.6	2	0.81	0.72	1.7	0.8	1.6	1.1	0.77	0.68	0.88	0.72	0.92	0.83	1.5	0.9	1.4	1.8	1.8	2	1.2	1.1	0.94	1.1	0.59	1.7	1.1	1.3	0.91	0.46	0.39	0.14	5	1.5	2.1	1.1	2.8	-	-	-	-	-	-
o3:ppm	0.03	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.01	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Wiang, Mueang

index	2020-05	2020-04	2020-03	2020-02	2020-01	2019-12	2019-11	2019-10	2019-09	2019-08	2019-07	2019-06	2019-05	2019-04	2019-03	2019-02	2019-01	2018-12	2018-11	2018-10	2018-09	2018-08	2018-07	2018-06	2018-05	2018-04	2018-03	2018-02	2018-01	2017-12	2017-11	2017-10	2017-09	2017-08	2017-07	2017-06	2017-05	2017-04	2017-03	2017-02	2017-01	2016-12	2016-11	2016-10	2016-09	2016-08	2016-07	2016-06	2016-05	2016-04	2016-03	2016-02	2016-01	2015-12	2015-11	2015-10
o3:ppm	0.02	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.02	0.02	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.02	0.03	0.04	0.05	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.03	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.03	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01
co:ppm	0.43	0.81	1	0.71	0.65	0.65	0.6	0.53	0.49	0.33	0.23	0.46	0.85	1.1	1.1	0.55	0.54	0.56	0.47	0.46	0.4	0.57	0.26	0.5	0.38	0.49	0.67	0.73	0.49	0.49	1	0.94	0.64	0.44	0.3	0.34	0.56	0.49	0.65	0.49	0.42	0.42	0.4	0.36	0.2	0.21	0.23	0.17	0.54	0.56	0.66	0.62	0.47	0.47	2.3	0.43
pm10	30	82	134	73	39	37	27	23	22	28	23	24	71	107	119	73	39	44	33	30	19	34	14	18	28	60	77	57	32	35	25	19	20	16	15	16	38	49	71	52	31	39	23	23	19	16	12	15	46	109	113	63	39	33	26	31
so2:ppm	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	-	-	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.01	0	0	0	0	0.01	0	0	0	0.02	0	0	0	0	-	-	0
no2:ppm	0	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0	0	0	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0	0	0	0	0	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0	0	0	0	0	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.01	-	0.01	-

* Pollution data source: https://openaq.org (Thailand) The data is licensed under CC-By 4.0